by [paradox] on 2012-01-13 04:10 CET

omg there is a 1 of and a 3 of in duodax's list!!! X0
lol congratz duo

---

by bingoking123 on 2012-01-13 05:45 CET

would have won if i didnt get mana screwed against dudoax

---

by moscowdemon on 2012-01-13 06:08 CET

bingoking123: Is that based purely on speculation or have you done some serious testing against that list?

---

by Atreties on 2012-01-13 07:44 CET

I also would have won if I had everything go right in all of my games, I drew the exact number of lands i needed at the exact right time, and the exact answers to their problem cards, and then if i reduced their life to 0 twice before 50 minutes elapsed.

:P

---

by darkwizard42 on 2012-01-13 07:51 CET

I am firmly convinced that Duodax simply chooses a few colors at random, then plays only the strongest cards in those colors as 4-ofs and then proceeds to demolish. props Duodax, best cards = best result

---

by EMA on 2012-01-13 09:52 CET

Ban Delver imo

---

by Halldir on 2012-01-13 09:58 CET

Atreties: nice one :D

---

by MitchMachine on 2012-01-13 10:01 CET

I hate u duodax, that's my list with a few changes :(

---

by Jacois on 2012-01-13 12:14 CET

Ban Serum Visions obv, and every other blue card that costs U.

---

by Truth- on 2012-01-13 12:21 CET

That same deck is all over modo... nothing new

---

by MitchMachine on 2012-01-13 12:57 CET

I shipped that list obv

---

by straca3 on 2012-01-13 17:52 CET

Sux that our 1st game in finals crushed when I was winning, then I blew sideboarding and died.

---

by tchiseen on 2012-01-13 18:45 CET

ban U

---

by jfc on 2012-01-13 20:44 CET

yeah.. i cant believe aswell there is a 1 of in duodax list :p

---

by jfc on 2012-01-13 20:45 CET

btw, am i the only one that thinks 4 command is a lot?

---

by MitchMachine on 2012-01-13 20:50 CET

nope

---

by mister_milk on 2012-01-16 07:08 CET

the 1 of is the 5th inquisition, don't be fooled!

---