by UssyF on 2009-12-26 20:12 CET

Woot nice I was going to play WW but I went to meet my cousins so I missed the trial :/

---

by Duodax on 2009-12-26 20:18 CET

cool just all the good cards threwn together in a deck. fame slayer slayed for fame one more time

---

by AncientSion on 2009-12-26 20:32 CET

ppl just mix up their standard deck and their standart sideboard and add in more lands and subpar cards.
great format. Why the hell are their tourneys for this shit.

---

by Huskie on 2009-12-26 20:50 CET

MUAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHAHA
FAME SLAYER!

---

by MrBrett on 2009-12-26 21:20 CET

goofy formats are cool, but honestly i don't see the point in this one neither

---

by cmc on 2009-12-26 21:28 CET

no sb gg

---

by Trotsky1 on 2009-12-26 21:29 CET

Cause when the magic season comes to a close it gives the best chance to play formats like this.

---

by Lynolf on 2009-12-26 22:31 CET

No, seriously, this format is dumb. All you have to do is add more lands, add repeated cards you usually don't have as 4-ofs, and the deck is practically the same. In fact, just look at this top4 and see that what I'm telling its true. If the purpose for this kind of trials is to see variety, you might as well make a 60-card Standard Singleton trial. It would be much more fun...

---

by proxie404 on 2009-12-26 23:19 CET

by Lynolf on 2009-12-26 16:31 EST
No, seriously, this format is dumb. All you have to do is add more lands, add repeated cards you usually don't have as 4-ofs, and the deck is practically the same. In fact, just look at this top4 and see that what I'm telling its true. If the purpose for this kind of trials is to see variety, you might as well make a 60-card Standard Singleton trial. It would be much more fun...


agreed ! xD

---

by Ryk on 2009-12-27 00:05 CET

lol no sb gg jcbacardi

---

by Eldariel on 2009-12-27 00:40 CET

I woulda made mono-red. Bleh.

---

by doc_morriar on 2009-12-27 01:09 CET

I wish i could have played this format, crypt of agadeem would have comboed, with traumatize ftw, i made one up but couldnt make it

---

by P_P4E on 2009-12-27 01:12 CET

Lets analyze each deck shall we?

Oh wait, there's no point because this format is irrelevant.

Thank you again magic-league.

---

by jcbacardi on 2009-12-27 02:04 CET

to be fair... all i've done was putting my sideboard into play and add more lands :D no need for more cards.. yes I lost the final because I was screwed, but still I one of the games with only 3 mana on the table ahhaha :D

---

by AXiLLA on 2009-12-27 05:27 CET

pffft
I'm glad Magic-league host's these kind of special trials =)

---

by Tao on 2009-12-27 06:22 CET

Yeah, you guys are ridiculous. Magic-league hosts a clearly casual format, and you all blow off the handle. Get a grip.

---

by skittles on 2009-12-27 09:14 CET

Ridiculous? Nah. This format is pretty stupid. I do enjoy fun formats. I hope they have more RFT. Those are great, in my opinion.

---

by Wichtelman on 2009-12-27 11:18 CET

you won that game cuz you had all 3 colors
turn 2 leech turn 3 thrinax then pulse and charm
for both pledge drawing just gas
instead of lands :P
gogo RFT!

---