|
| ||||||||||||||||||
|
April 2009 Standard (T2) tournament Deck lists
These April 2009 Standard (T2) Magic: the Gathering Deck lists of the Monday, January 19 Standard (T2) MWS Trial were updated by Eldariel.
Go back to our Magic: the Gathering Decks Index See all Magic: the Gathering Decks from this tournament Comments:
by
Eldariel on 2009-01-19 23:30 EDT Whatever happened to the metagame? by Dakkon555 on 2009-01-19 23:34 EDT ^
by Truth- on 2009-01-19 23:48 EDT Sadly I had to drop after round three. I beat the TC and he started getting mad because I told him I was taking the win and Dropping. I am pretty sure if I did not have to leave I would have won. My deck was really Solid. and from the looks of most of the 3-1 and up I had good match ups all around. by JSUOversoul on 2009-01-20 00:29 EDT That Black/White tokens list has got to be one of the worst ones I've seen. Not really meaning to be completely offensive, but it's splashing blue ONLY for Broken Ambitions and Snakeform.... why? The deck doesn't need Ambitions, and Snakeform is ok, but why not use Condemn there? It just seems really strange, and makes your mana very awkward looking. Maybe you had no problems with it, seeing how you made top 4, and maybe people have done it and it's just the first I've seen of it, but having played the deck for the last couple months, I just think the splash slots could be used for better things. by Kytep on 2009-01-20 00:53 EDT SilverMcHowl - I have to ask: What is your reasoning for including Timmy, Power Gamer (aka Elvish Piper)? Other than your 4 Realm Razers, it doesn't look to me like you have that many creatures so high on the mana curve that you'd have much trouble hard-casting them, rather than spending 5 mana on a vulnerable 1/1 and its first activation. But maybe I'm missing something (e.g., are the Realm Razers alone worth the Pipers; if so, what about Dramatic Entrance for less vulnerability)?? How did they work out for you? Would you keep them, or change them out for something else?
by Kytep on 2009-01-20 00:53 EDT Double-post by CB on 2009-01-20 00:54 EDT I don't get what the hell elvish piper does for that naya deck... Can someone please fill me in on how a 1/1 for 4 is ever good? by MCDrake on 2009-01-20 01:35 EDT These lists make my eyes bleed. by Silkenfist on 2009-01-20 02:39 EDT CB: Post-Razer, Piper enables you to keep dropping creatures. It also makes your Razer uncounterable. by Finntroll on 2009-01-20 04:16 EDT WTF happened to standard? by rajlob on 2009-01-20 04:39 EDT omg burreton
by Weedmonkey on 2009-01-20 05:09 EDT Realm Razor Zoo is <3, although that mana base still looks as fucked as ever.
by TheBends on 2009-01-20 05:09 EDT Haha rajlob i still prefere my take on Mono Red but you should play 4 Torment side because they are a house vs burrenton and maybe monglove would be good (This meta has so much burrenton :( ).
by SilverMcHowl on 2009-01-20 05:14 EDT Kytep, CB, what Silkenfist said. Although with bloomtenders i dont always need Piper, it is a nice advantage. But the main reason, like Silkenfist pointed out, is the uncouterable Razer drop. It's also nice to drop a cloudthresher with it. I've thought about Dramatic Entrance, playing it end of their turn, then if it gets countered, Realm is less likely to be countered on mine. However, Piper just works rather solid for getting Razer out there.
by ChiDoRiE on 2009-01-20 05:35 EDT LOL by Shagrath on 2009-01-20 05:36 EDT No fae at top4?
by TugaChampion on 2009-01-20 06:54 EDT No RW Lark at top4?
by SilverMcHowl on 2009-01-20 08:04 EDT I went up against what I assume was RW Lark (vengeant and lark was in it).
by Trotsky1 on 2009-01-20 08:35 EDT I honestly do not think the first place deck can afford to run the muta vaults. by Eldariel on 2009-01-20 09:07 EDT Btw guys, notice how pleasant and enjoyable it is without any of the national tensions around? by TheBends on 2009-01-20 09:12 EDT I aggree with you Eldariel :p.
by ElectricS on 2009-01-20 09:24 EDT On the BWu Tokens deck I played:
by RiQuSP on 2009-01-20 09:34 EDT "by Truth- on 2009-01-20 05:48 CET
by Klos on 2009-01-20 10:33 EDT 3 birds in the first deck ..... 1 more? by rajlob on 2009-01-20 10:38 EDT 4 rounds I beat 3 Fae and one BR by Dakkon555 on 2009-01-20 10:53 EDT "by Truth- on 2009-01-20 05:48 CET
by Triggers on 2009-01-20 11:20 EDT Piper seems alright in the Naya aggro deck.
by TugaChampion on 2009-01-20 12:43 EDT by Eldariel on 2009-01-20 14:07 GMT
by Truth- on 2009-01-20 13:14 EDT by RiQuSP on 2009-01-20 09:34 EST
by Truth- on 2009-01-20 13:16 EDT by TugaChampion on 2009-01-20 06:54 EST
by Truth- on 2009-01-20 13:18 EDT RW LArk by mtgsoldier on 2009-01-20 13:36 EDT "Like I said if I didn't have to drop I would have won"
by Truth- on 2009-01-20 13:37 EDT by mtgsoldier on 2009-01-20 13:36 EST
by Dakkon555 on 2009-01-20 13:49 EDT ^
by SilverMcHowl on 2009-01-20 13:58 EDT It is insulting the people that DID make the top four. by Eldar on 2009-01-20 14:32 EDT Idk if anyone said this already, but the name of the first deck is Bloom Razer. by coolcreep on 2009-01-20 15:22 EDT He is obviously testing piper prematurely to see if it will work in the progenitus deck he is brewing up. Too bad progenitus has protection from elves, pipers, and coming into play with activated abilities. by SilverMcHowl on 2009-01-20 16:39 EDT Eldar, i'd prefer to call it something else, but it keeps getting turned down. BOP goes Razer is what i tend to call it.
by Hardgeus on 2009-01-20 17:04 EDT Coolcreep what do you mean by:
by CB on 2009-01-20 19:45 EDT I'm pretty sure cool creep was just making a funny. by ZW on 2009-01-20 20:03 EDT that 1st deck is so ridiculously horrible... by PsyHye on 2009-01-21 16:02 EDT I don't normally comment negatively or comment at all on this web page but I have to say something about that 1st place deck...
by Boogaloo on 2009-01-22 02:03 EDT Nice one SilverMcHowl! by [R]Nchamay on 2009-01-22 19:13 EDT God, if only I would have joined this trial I would have won. The deck I would have ran would have pwned all you nubs. God I'm awesome. fukin nubbsss. ugh. by CPal on 2009-01-23 12:40 EDT wow std is stupid look that awful bant deck |
||||||||||||||||||
|
League Info
Play Rooms
Download & Guides
![]() Features
|
Login
Links
|
|||||||||||||||||
All content on this page may not be reproduced without written consent of Magic-League Directors.
Magic the Gathering is TM and copyright Wizards of the Coast, Inc, a subsidiary of Hasbro, Inc. All rights reserved.