by Johnno3k on 2007-12-30 16:31 MDT

Wow goblins finally up there. I think

---

by on 2007-12-30 16:51 MDT

goblins always top4s somehpw what are u talking about

---

by Holzi on 2007-12-30 16:56 MDT

mtg.de ftw and so on....

---

by BlueMage22 on 2007-12-30 19:07 MDT

Congrats Demon, I'm not that annoyed to lose to the eventual winner. Nice job.

---

by Daveslusher- on 2007-12-30 20:36 MDT

1 Empty the Warrens
1 Duress
1 Gamble
1 Channel the Suns
4 Tormod's Crypt
1 Unmask
1 Tendrils of Agony
1 Cave-In
4 Pyroblast
.....no...
anyways people need to learn to play combo that isn't cret. Fetchland Tendrils and TES are calling people, and THEY'RE BETTER

---

by KillemallCFH on 2007-12-30 20:51 MDT

Yeah, but those decks actually require you to think.

---

by TwoTrees on 2007-12-30 21:43 MDT

Lol

---

by Daveslusher- on 2007-12-30 23:28 MDT

sadly thats true

---

by ajvanadri on 2007-12-31 00:38 MDT

Sigh, Im starting to get sick of the people comming here, and saying "that deck sucks should have played this one" if you think you have the meta game answer, then go out and win with it... either shit, or get off the pot.

but thats just my 2 cents

---

by Ro on 2007-12-31 02:50 MDT

lol just before the tournament I told my friend to netdeck d3mon's latest legacy creation

---

by pado88 on 2007-12-31 04:38 MDT

Damned pairings, i can't win against belcher :p
Nice landstill deck.
gz to other top 4

---

by Eldariel on 2007-12-31 09:07 MDT

Why didn't goblins sideboard Chalice of the Void?

---

by pado88 on 2007-12-31 11:42 MDT

chalice will be useless.
g1 and g3 belcher went off at the first turn

---

by Trotsky1 on 2007-12-31 12:36 MDT

thats why goblins should run pithing needle in the sb.

---

by on 2007-12-31 12:38 MDT

yes and thats why belcher goes off turn 1 or 2 vs goblins every time cuz ur disruption is 1 card

---

by Daveslusher- on 2007-12-31 13:52 MDT

by ajvanadri on 2007-12-31 02:38 EST

Sigh, Im starting to get sick of the people comming here, and saying "that deck sucks should have played this one" if you think you have the meta game answer, then go out and win with it... either shit, or get off the pot.

but thats just my 2 cents

my point is a valid one. Everyone here plays the easiest combo deck in the format.
NO:
iGGy Pop
TES
these decks are much better it's just people like adrian and lennin manage to god draw into finals so everyone else think "oh this deck is good" meanwhile cret hasn't put up results since worlds and none of them went undefeated = /

---

by SteveMan on 2007-12-31 14:28 MDT

Staaax

---

by MiguelG on 2007-12-31 15:59 MDT

u should add 4 xantid swarm and 4 magus of the moon to belchers sb :P they worked for me at worlds

---

by Avata on 2007-12-31 16:08 MDT

"my point is a valid one. Everyone here plays the easiest combo deck in the format."

Of course more people are going to play combo decks that are easy to pilot. The less mistakes you make, the more games you'll win, so if you don't have a ton of time to test a lot of decks, why play a deck that's going to give you more opportunities to make mistakes?

If you're on limited testing time, you're far better off playing a simple deck that is capable of winning than a deck that might be technically better but provides many more opportunities for play errors.

---

by Daveslusher- on 2007-12-31 16:22 MDT

right i forgot legacy is an irrelevant format here.

---

by on 2007-12-31 17:55 MDT

yes legacy is irrelevant and there hasnt rly been any legacy since worlds so ur point doesnt really make sense dave, and i agree that those decks are better but sometimes i just dont feel like thinking, i can get to the finals on my own as ive done it before, but i understand what ur talking about

---

by Daveslusher- on 2007-12-31 19:24 MDT

yes legacy is irrelevant and there hasnt rly been any legacy since worlds so ur point doesnt really make sense dave,

there have been pleanty of legacy events = /

---

by BlueMage22 on 2007-12-31 19:35 MDT

I was considering playing Fetchland Tendrils before the trial, but Landstill seemed like an infinitely safer choice that involved a lot less risk of being blown out by something stupid. I do agree that CRET Belcher is a lot worse then TES or Fetchland Tendrils when they have competent pilots, but it's not always so easy to play tutor based combo at a high level for 5+ rounds.

---

by on 2007-12-31 20:43 MDT

there havent really been a lot of legacy events, the reason people dont know the meta is that there is no real coverage at least on the major magic sites as legacy is played a lot in europe and not in north america a lot.

---

by d3m0n on 2008-01-01 13:58 MDT

I saw a decklist with 4 Colors and Landstill on Gencon Legacy.
Then i just had to remove the weak cards and add the powerful Intuition idea :)

I just knew this deck has all it needs :)

---

by dennooze on 2008-01-15 07:15 MDT

Honestly, I prefer Legacy and Extended and Type 2.

I somehow felt that Type 2 sucks, but because I don't have much exposures to it and furthermore, vintage stuffs are expensive as I can't afford them.

So the only way for me to play them is to start with Type 2. Anyway my job is starting to deprive me of my free time.

---