by BigPapi- on 2007-09-28 22:03 MDT

1st

---

by BigPapi- on 2007-09-28 22:03 MDT

lol im surprised there's no angelfire

---

by pado88 on 2007-09-29 01:10 MDT

2nd

---

by Ro on 2007-09-29 07:46 MDT

Why?

---

by Trotsky1 on 2007-09-29 08:34 MDT

I dont like all these control decks running only 23 lands even with 6 signets it doesnt seem enough.

---

by r0fl on 2007-09-29 08:50 MDT

its called solar flare.. and they're supposed to be playing 23

---

by ringman on 2007-09-29 09:16 MDT

trotsky but obviously 29 "lands "is not enough.why should we play half a deck of lands when we could be playing 60 land.deck?gogogo 60 islands.deck!!

---

by Trotsky1 on 2007-09-29 10:07 MDT

i was not just refering to the winning list but multiple angelfire lists as well and there not suppose to be playing 23. 23 is far to few for a control deck. Its more understandable in angelfire as it has a slightly lower curve than solar flare but still bad.

As a rule signets count for half a land so 6 signets makes it 26 land not 29.
I run angelfire with 24 lands and still run into many unkeepable 1 land hands, plus compulsive research demands you run a few more lands in itself. Assuming the list in question is running research and not alternative card draw.

---

by n1ck on 2007-09-29 11:08 MDT

bounce lands are 2 in 1 lands

---

by Headbanger on 2007-09-29 18:52 MDT

25 lands in RG gargagoyf?? isnt it too much?

---

by r0fl on 2007-09-29 23:19 MDT

curve is higher with siege gang

---

by Dan_G on 2007-10-05 09:47 MDT

These control decks that run 23 land are mid-range control decks and they are mostly tapping out each turn to play spells unlike regurlar control decks which need to make their land drops every turn which is why they run a lot more land.

---