by Ch0b1 on 2007-07-18 08:03 MDT

4 magus of the tabernacle omfg

---

by PaUl0_BRA on 2007-07-18 09:45 MDT

my deck won! =P
Sam_T stole it !!!

---

by Manipulation on 2007-07-18 09:52 MDT

Well, Magus>Aggro of the format, and considering how aggro-heavy it is...

---

by FiReBLT on 2007-07-18 10:32 MDT

What was Gathan Raiders sided in against in the Mono Red Deck?

---

by kreff on 2007-07-18 11:10 MDT

i think is sb in allways XDD

---

by coolcreep on 2007-07-18 11:43 MDT

I hope the dude who didnt put any raiders maindeck but 4 SB has a baby so i can dropkick it in the dick.

---

by Firebelly on 2007-07-18 12:15 MDT

my matches were all 2-1 wins. my sb is bad, i didnt cast dormant against slivers cause i was in defensive mode when i had him in my hand and wouldve rather held some sort of removal. he also got landflooded g3 and it shouldve been a better fight so i got a little lucky. i brought in dead/gone almost every match so maybe they should come to md, but its pretty tight and worked pretty well for like throwing it together right before the trial. sam_t also raped me in the finals, couldnt hit a land but his deck ran really well.

---

by sandoiche on 2007-07-18 13:13 MDT

disintegrate is bad, so is thunderblade charge

gathan is really MD, its just so good

and arrows is totally crap too :/

---

by Shivan1 on 2007-07-18 15:33 MDT

I take it you're using sarcasm since that is your deck?

Why are you playing serrated arrows in an aggro deck - it's not a creature and it doesn't deal your opponent damage... what good is it?

Also with control decks so popular in the format, why not molten disaster as a finisher instead of disintegrate?

---

by MotC on 2007-07-18 15:52 MDT

Because no one wants to own slivers with molten disaster. (Split second= i beat slivers)

---

by Djinn on 2007-07-18 16:38 MDT

had we some metagame breakdown, we'd know how many slivers played and how needed molten disasters are :)

---

by Shivan1 on 2007-07-18 17:05 MDT

Not only slivers but it wrecks control because now you have uncounterable x-spell coming at them. :(

---

by Eldariel on 2007-07-18 18:54 MDT

Uw Pickles 2
Mono-Blue Pickles 4
4c Goyf 1
WG Goyf 10
WGr Goyf 3
WGu Goyf 1
Gu Goyf 1
Mono-Red Aggro 2
Venomous Slivers 8
BG Control With Beaters 1
Gr Manaramp 1
"Sui Black" 2
Ubr Reanimator 1
Urg Tarmoreanimator 1
UWr Control 1
UBrw Teachings 7
UWb Teachings 1
UBw Teachings 10
UBr Teachings 2
UBg Teachings 2
UB Teachings 2
Ub Pickles 1
Sliver Pair 3
GRb Manaramp 1
Uw Control 1
Uw Blink 1
WW 3
Rb Rack 1
Ug Pickles 3
RBu Control 3
Restore Gargadon 1
Mishra Control 1
Wg Tokenless Token Mesa Whatever.dec 1
Boros...in block? 1
Time Stuff 1

Note, this doesn't reflect the actual lists; there were no two same lists, save Karsten's teachings and perhaps some Goyf-variant. Oh, and as is obvious, most Teachings-decks and Goyf-decks were in the 1-1 or 0-1 bracket. Slivers did even worse, Wild Pair going 0-1 twice and Venomous Slivers not breaching top with overwhelming numbers.

Other than that, yea, numbers FTW.

---

by SkaTista on 2007-07-18 20:59 MDT

Sandoiche >>> ALL

---

by Felipidrimon on 2007-07-18 22:34 MDT

Go Sam_T!!!
bagels FTW!!!

---

by Vlada on 2007-07-19 07:03 MDT

Wg Tokenless Token Mesa Whatever.dec 1


LOL

The closer serious block tournaments are, the funnier ml decks are

ctrl+q+e

Special ctrl+q+e for Firebelly and his sideboard.

---

by DESTRUCTOR on 2007-07-19 11:28 MDT

my deck was an UW mesa-control went 1-0 drop...i think it was the one they called Uw control, but it has many white cards :p

nice picles decks splashing white for momentary blink is a cool idea

---