by sgtpepper87 on 2006-09-03 08:37 MDT

gratz Core :)

---

by Meatwarz on 2006-09-03 08:39 MDT

SECOND!

MW|Core, you got no money for duals&pains? poor guy. Why didn't you asked me to borrow 'em to you, i got set of both NM condition.

---

by flynnT on 2006-09-03 08:41 MDT

yeah, gratz core!

#mtg.de ftw.

---

by Void06 on 2006-09-03 08:50 MDT

Too good for repeal, cimic?

---

by Rodry on 2006-09-03 09:06 MDT

by Meatwarz on 2006-09-03 16:39 CET

SECOND!

MW|Core, you got no money for duals&pains? poor guy. Why didn't you asked me to borrow 'em to you, i got set of both NM condition.

U know what scrying sheets do? Then maybe that "poor snow lands" are better than the duals >_>

Pd: DQ ftw

---

by TugaChampion on 2006-09-03 09:13 MDT

the "poor snow lands" are worse than duals but in snow decks they are probably better. But still in general duals are way better.

---

by PTN1 on 2006-09-03 09:14 MDT

geez thats an exact copy off akira asaharas deck

---

by Meatwarz on 2006-09-03 09:39 MDT

Thx for explanation Rodry, now i c that, pretty obv

---

by vizion_15 on 2006-09-03 09:50 MDT

obv grast to core nice deck and grast to bestard

and a big grast to sexican- cuz is on my team



teamwasteland

---

by indie on 2006-09-03 10:36 MDT

gratz for cimc, this is like the 4th master in a rope he loses quater-finals

---

by Archimede on 2006-09-03 10:46 MDT

Who did win against Sexycan?

---

by kikimikejiki on 2006-09-03 10:49 MDT

the zoo deck who got lucky both games

---

by Vodka_7up on 2006-09-03 12:16 MDT

Uh isn't that what Zoo does? Get's lucky, for god sakes it has to battle it's own mana bases before it can beat you.

---

by MeddlingMatt on 2006-09-03 13:07 MDT

How did the Owl work out for yah, cimc? While being able to put the game away in 1-2 swings is huge, so is the casting cost for a relatively vanilla flying */*. And if this IS your fourth (or something) master in a row to top 8, congrats, impressive.

---

by Columbus on 2006-09-03 13:27 MDT

Yay! More netdecks from little kids who can't build anything on their own!

Look how much raw talent you kids have. You can log on to Starcitygames.com and copy a first place deck! You're SO GOOD!

---

by SteveOB on 2006-09-03 13:39 MDT

PLS DIE COLUMBUS

---

by Djinn on 2006-09-03 14:10 MDT

Ya, and they can still qualify for their nats and some pro tours. And yes, they can go x-0 in a master.

---

by ChristPunchr on 2006-09-03 14:27 MDT

Heh, Columbus is hilarious.

---

by affinity104 on 2006-09-03 14:31 MDT

I think everyone at this site wants columbus to die a horrible death

---

by UNCGCho on 2006-09-03 14:33 MDT

People always make fun of netdeck. Obvi, they win. So what is there to make fun of? A deck either wins or it doesn't.
Congrats to the winner.

---

by MousesPod on 2006-09-03 15:03 MDT

I for one agree with Columbus. Netdecking is one of the worst things going for this game right now. Have people completely forgotten how to have any ideas of their own???

---

by dimirS on 2006-09-03 15:47 MDT

hey it is columbus under a new name, mousespod. Nice try. Still try to win actually for once. Play something proven.

---

by kebe on 2006-09-03 18:45 MDT

well u need to stop complaining about netdecking bcuz for competetive magic one of the keys to winning is playing the best deck whether or not u amde it up urself and if u insist that using some1 elses list is bad then u shud go back to casual magic scrub cuz ur not winnign any real tournaments anytime soon
so columbus
die plz

---

by flynnT on 2006-09-03 19:11 MDT

when do people realize that columbus is:
a) inapproachable by arguments,
b) inapproachable to arguments,
c) inapproachable for arguments,
d) inapproachable with arguments?

pick the correct phrase.

---

by WoodSage on 2006-09-03 21:38 MDT

I wanted to say well done to the top 8 that played EIGHT DIFFERENT DECKS !!!

T2 is still amazingly diverse (of course that makes it rough on us rogue deckbuilders, no "solution decks" for us :P but on the flip side anything goes)

---

by MousesPod on 2006-09-04 21:43 MDT

Well, I went 3-1-2 drop with my own deck, I wouldn't say that's too bad. As for netdecking, sure, for anything important like a PTQ, I'm not completely against it. But for some stupid bullshit like on here, what do I care? I'm not out a registration fee, and I still get to see how well my ideas mesh synergistically. It's all a matter of playtesting. This isn't sanctioned, so it doesn't matter.

---

by MousesPod on 2006-09-04 21:44 MDT

Well, I went 3-1-2 drop with my own deck, I wouldn't say that's too bad. As for netdecking, sure, for anything important like a PTQ, I'm not completely against it. But for some stupid bullshit like on here, what do I care? I'm not out a registration fee, and I still get to see how well my ideas mesh synergistically. It's all a matter of playtesting. This isn't sanctioned, so it doesn't matter.

---

by styx^ on 2006-09-05 05:39 MDT

"#mtg.de ftw."

so true! and grats chris, too

---

by DvK on 2006-09-06 23:53 MDT

yeah columbus 3-1-2 drop is such a GOOD score. c'mon, brag some more

---

by aggroking on 2006-09-09 11:51 MDT

btw i didnt netdeck! i played the snakes deck for month, a long time before the first players started to realize how ridicolous snakes is.
fu columbus!

---

by crew on 2006-09-14 00:25 MDT

eat shit columbus

---