by Lunarvoltage on 2006-08-25 05:17 MDT

Fir- I mean, gj everyone. Why all 4 Cranials in Flares sb?

---

by snorlax on 2006-08-25 05:59 MDT

because 4 cranial vs vore, tron, mirror and ideal are fondamental!

---

by sgtpepper87 on 2006-08-25 06:08 MDT

gj aggroking :>

---

by aggroking on 2006-08-25 06:20 MDT

thx pepper :p

---

by Djinn on 2006-08-25 07:56 MDT

4 Coat of Arms? :\

---

by the_guy_123 on 2006-08-25 08:09 MDT

Isn't Coat of Arms getting dangerous with all the "tribal" decks running around?

---

by aggroking on 2006-08-25 08:27 MDT

no it wins alway you lay it down

---

by Rodry on 2006-08-25 08:31 MDT

Wow yes, a lot of tribal decks, elves, goblins, wizards, golemns ¬¬

---

by ringman on 2006-08-25 08:37 MDT

rodry u forgot dumbass!!!
im running a dumbass version too and always lose everytime he lays down coat.oh wait everytime he lays down anything!!!

---

by Synch- on 2006-08-25 09:21 MDT

good top 3

---

by fishfood on 2006-08-25 09:44 MDT

I like the flare list, but why only 2 zombifies?

---

by SOAD on 2006-08-25 10:00 MDT

because solar flare doesnt need the sombify indeed its a control deck.

---

by BlackYoshi on 2006-08-25 11:04 MDT

Valkryie and a dragon legend is pretty brutal, especially if you get miren out.

---

by Spooge on 2006-08-25 15:30 MDT

after kamigawa rotation valkyrie and vampire will replace the dragon legends

---

by JoelMonteiro on 2006-08-25 15:34 MDT

Adarkar Valkyrie comboes well with the Legendary Dragons...

---

by xmtgjunkiex on 2006-08-25 16:49 MDT

aggroking is a beast with Snakes =D

---

by Columbus on 2006-08-25 17:19 MDT

Hooray to the netdeckers!

It takes so much raw Magic talent to copy a 1st place decklist from Starcitygames.com and win with it!

I'm so impressed!

---

by crew on 2006-08-25 17:23 MDT

stfu Columbus

---

by blackcat77 on 2006-08-25 18:22 MDT

Neat Cumbus has decided to cry again...Go away and dont come crying back.

---

by Concepcion on 2006-08-25 20:15 MDT

I'm so tired of hearing Columbus bitch about netdecking. He complains when its a netdeck, and calls it a 'bad version' of some netdeck when its different.

Columbus: Some people play this game to win, and that means playing the best possible deck they can get their hands on. In a competition where the goal is to win, you expect people to bring a deck that is subpar? Something like 99% of rogue decks are worse than one of the Tier 1 decks.

---

by s0b3k on 2006-08-26 01:14 MDT

Columbus there are 2 important but separate aspects to magic in my mind...
1. Deck building
2. Playing

you dont have to be good at both, some people get enjoyment by making a deck that a skilled player can pilot to a victory while many others enjoy the act of winning... Tell me one person who would, when offered a winning deck, turn it down and instead take a pile that they have tested to a lossing record to play at a tournament, and i'll tell you a person that lacks common sence. the goal of any game is to have fun and if you get your jollys off losing then lets play a few hundred leagues my rating needs to be raised.

---

by sonicqaz on 2006-08-26 01:15 MDT

Listen, for the last FREAKING time, stop asking why snakes wins! It's an explosive deck, and it has proven itself over and over and over again. It's the best aggro-control deck in the format. It is one of the few decks that doesnt absolutely crumble to a certain type of deck. That makes it, by itself, a good choice for tournament magic.

---

by aggroking on 2006-08-26 05:58 MDT

no i wouldnt suggst you playing snakes! its just so bad! dont play it! you will loose! dont play snakes!

---

by Meatwarz on 2006-08-26 11:46 MDT

Yeah, that shit SUCKS, NEVER play them if you want to win..

---

by AznSensation on 2006-08-27 18:55 MDT

yeah solarflare is the best but it could of got 1st n00b!

---