by sorot on 2006-04-14 04:50 MDT

Ahh BW ?? why it so work

---

by _bouncyer_ on 2006-04-14 06:16 MDT

Two best players who played, placed top 2. =0 GG n00bs.

-Bouncy AkA pGFan

---

by synch987 on 2006-04-14 06:19 MDT

sweet list pollo, seriously

always nice to see GG-G

---

by Simonshiro on 2006-04-14 07:42 MDT

Nice guys

---

by Shagrath on 2006-04-14 08:33 MDT

Orzhov anti-orzhov sounds good to me

---

by Meatwarz on 2006-04-14 09:24 MDT

w00t! Why NO GIFTS!? not enought skill or what?

---

by TIm_54 on 2006-04-14 10:09 MDT

the deck is so much more consistent suprisingly without gifts.

---

by NahHolmes on 2006-04-14 13:11 MDT

No Sensie Top, no Gifts, only 3 Goods... I have to admit I'm suprised you have literally a 90% win percentage with that list. You drew all four Cranials against me G3 that one time then I lucked out and somebody deleted the ratings.

---

by MeddlingMatt on 2006-04-14 14:26 MDT

The two best players got first and second? Low and behold, the system works!! Now that we have proof that being a better player means you win more, we can cut out these 1700+ trials that give the supposedly better players and advantage over the supposed newbs.

Also, the seemifinals may (or may not) have been different had I not missed my fourth land drop with Extraction in hand, allowing Daro_G to draw an extraction and extract my extractions on his fourth turn after mine.

---

by Re-Venge on 2006-04-14 14:32 MDT

first of all, i will introduce myself. i was one of daro_g's teamates for ptq charleston... and it was there that he made that deck, sorta. he had to use that cause it was all we had, and he whent 5-2 only losing to god draws, and realized it is easily the best deck in the format

NahHolmes: it does have tops. it doesnt need goods to win, and gifts is semi-replaced with congregation, which allows the deck to run vitu ghazi cause of less mana issues.

MeatWarz: daro is easily better than most every person on this site, the lack of gifts was to allow for a more stable mana base, and the deck does not need gifts to win. running congregation instead allows for you to get 3 loxodon's, essentially killing aggro.

---

by kukumuku on 2006-04-14 14:42 MDT

yet somehow it lost to an aggro deck in the finals... strange...

---

by MeddlingMatt on 2006-04-14 15:05 MDT

kukumuku, he dropped to allow (i assume) someone he knew to get an invite to the Tourney he already had an entry into. He didn't actually lose. Is this ethical? Once the top three was decided the odd man out would have had to have basically gone 2-0, beating a team to win the tourney. While Pollo had only to hope that the odd man out would lose either one of two matches, and he would be in.

---

by C-Board on 2006-04-14 17:56 MDT

heres the thing, I work almost every saturday, so the likelyhood of me playing in the master is almost slim and none

and pollo is meh buddy so idc really

and its not like I needed the auto-invite, so I gave it to him

Naholmes: this deck is much better than the beachhouse variants, due to the fact this is has alot more options it can pull off, 4 tops is a MUST, plz look over the list before criticizing it.
-DG

---

by MeddlingMatt on 2006-04-14 18:55 MDT

"so we"...

So you what? Threw the title game?

---

by FRIBURGUENSE on 2006-04-14 19:45 MDT

Aew,
LoOoOoOoOoOoL...!!!...WTF two monocolors winners?...;[...WW?...Warhammer?...Crap...;[
...Abraços!!!(=P)

---

by C-Board on 2006-04-15 01:11 MDT

its not exactly throwing the game, because Im prolly not playing in the invitational anyways and pollo is

---

by kukumuku on 2006-04-15 10:54 MDT

Friburguense, beloved retard, wrong trial. Ass.

---

by Bejeezus on 2006-04-19 14:09 MDT

Just a sidenote:
Pollo owes #Beggars $10 cuz he won.
- Bejeezus

---